Dubai, United Arab Emirates, October 11, 2025. CryptoSecurityWatch releases an independent analysis of today’s stablecoin volatility after USDe traded as low as roughly 0.65 against USDT on major venues before rebounding toward parity. The move unfolded during a historic wave of forced liquidations that swept through crypto futures and spot markets. Reports and venue posts show the depeg and rapid recovery, while market data providers recorded one of the largest single day liquidation totals on record.
What Happened to USDe and Why It Escalated
In the early UTC hours of October 11, order books across several venues thinned as sellers hit bids into a fast market. During the heaviest prints, USDe traded as low as about 0.65 on the USDT pair and even lower against USDC in isolated matches before recovering. This wick coincided with a market wide deleveraging that cleared billions of dollars in long positions, creating feedback loops between spot depth, index pricing, and derivatives funding.
Independent reporting indicates that the liquidation wave reached unprecedented scale over the same 24 hour window. Bloomberg cites Coinglass data showing more than 19 billion dollars of leveraged positions wiped out across the market, with over a million traders affected. CoinDesk separately reported more than 16 billion dollars in long liquidations as risk assets sold off. Liquidity that normally anchors stablecoin trading pairs became patchy, which increased the chance that a single thin trade would set an extreme print.
USDe’s footprint had expanded in September when Binance listed the asset, increasing the number of venues and pairs where price discovery could occur. Wider distribution improves access in calm periods, but it also means that stress can propagate more quickly across multiple markets when liquidity vanishes at the top of the book.
What the Event Reveals About Stablecoin Design
Today’s price action underscores four practical controls that determine whether a dollar token holds up under stress.
- Reserves must behave like cash, favoring short duration, high quality dollar linked instruments over complex or correlated assets.
- Redemptions must remain predictable and observable, with clear timelines, fees, and capacity management that continue to function when volumes surge.
- Pricing should be sourced from multiple active venues with depth thresholds and outlier filters, ensuring a single thin trade does not define system behavior.
- Control systems such as spread wideners or temporary flow brakes should activate during abnormal volatility so that markets clear in an orderly way rather than forcing mispriced redemptions.
These are not marketing points. They are operational requirements that separate a resilient peg from a fragile one when screens turn red.
Applying the Lens. Why a Peg First Model Like USAD Matters
Within this framework, CryptoSecurityWatch examined public documentation for USAD, a dollar pegged token announced by KAI Exchange in August 2025. The issuer positions USAD as fully collateralized with liquid dollar linked instruments, rule based redemptions that can scale under stress, and multi venue pricing with outlier filters. The model avoids derivatives for parity and prioritizes disclosure and process over yield.
This approach aligns with the peg first principles highlighted by today’s events. USAD’s design offers a clear reference for risk teams reevaluating collateral, margin, and venue standards following the USDe incident.
USAD Earn APY and Licensing Disclosures
KAI discloses that USAD Earn currently offers yields up to 6.25 percent APY on select fixed term products, with lower rates on shorter or flexible terms such as 5.15 percent for a monthly term and 3.5 percent for a biweekly term. These figures are displayed in the Product Zone and reflect the latest published rates at the time of writing. APY represents the annualized rate assuming compounding according to each product’s rules. Actual returns depend on the term you choose, the amount subscribed, and the time you remain in the product. Rates can change at any time, and returns are not guaranteed. See current APY details on the Earn page.
To help users evaluate governance and risk posture alongside yield, KAI states that it is registered in the United States as a Money Services Business and aligns with MiCA requirements in the European Union. KAI also notes that additional licensing applications in multiple jurisdictions are underway and that disclosures will be updated as statuses change. For more on our compliance posture, review the About page. These statements are provided to give users and risk teams context about oversight and operating standards without implying regulatory approval or endorsement.
Users should review product terms, redemption rules, and any lockup or early exit conditions before subscribing. USAD Earn products are subject to market, liquidity, and operational risks that are common to digital asset platforms. Consider your risk tolerance and diversification needs, and verify the current APY on the Earn page before making a decision.
Conclusion
The October 11 depeg showed how quickly a synthetic or funding dependent design can be pushed off parity when depth evaporates, indexes fragment, and liquidation engines fire at once. It also highlighted that stablecoin reliability depends on boring finance and predictable process. Cash like reserves, observable redemptions, multi venue pricing discipline, and built in volatility controls are the features that keep confidence anchored. In that context, peg first designs such as USAD present a straightforward architecture that risk owners can evaluate using live disclosures and rule sets rather than assumptions.
About CryptoSecurityWatch
CryptoSecurityWatch is an independent publication analyzing token design, infrastructure risk, and market integrity across centralized and decentralized systems.
Media Contact
CryptoSecurityWatch Research Desk
Email: info@cryptosecuritywatch.com
Editorial Note: This analysis is based on public data and issuer documentation available as of October 11, 2025. It does not constitute investment advice. Stablecoins involve risks including peg deviation, redemption delay, and counterparty exposure. Readers should verify source materials and conduct independent due diligence.